We are going to give you an example so that you can see where we are going: if you have a relatively old and low-end PC, with a GTX 1650 for example, it would be absurd to buy a 4K monitor to play, but it would also be absurd to go for a 4K monitor. 360 Hz because you will hardly have 360 FPS in games to see it properly.
Be right when choosing your next monitor with these tips
Let’s be honest: we would all love to have an RTX 4090 and a high refresh rate 4K monitor to fully enjoy gaming, but the reality is that very few people opt for that, mostly because of the money. Of course there are users who have top-of-the-range graphics, and in that case top-of-the-range monitors would be appropriate, but there are many more users who have more modest graphics and, therefore, we must settle for simpler monitors.
So, to make things easier, we have prepared the following table in which we cover the ranges that we consider the most common. Keep in mind that we have made this table thinking about a Gaming PCthat is, designed to play games. In each of the ranges we give you between one and three options that, from our point of view and experience, we consider appropriate.
| Graph | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low range: Radeon RX 550/560 GeForce GT 1030/1050 Intel Arc A310 |
Full HD 60Hz | Full HD 144 Hz (only games with low requirements) | |
| Input range: Radeon RX 6500 XT GeForce RTX 3050 Intel Arc A750 |
Full HD 144Hz | 1440p 60Hz | 4K (but not for gaming) |
| Mid-range: Radeon RX 7600 GeForce RTX 4060 |
Full HD 240Hz | 1440p 144Hz | 4K 60Hz (low requirements games only) |
| Medium-high range: Radeon RX 7600 XT GeForce RTX 4070 Intel Arc A770 |
Full HD 360Hz | 1440p 144-180Hz | 4K 60Hz |
| High range: Radeon RX 7800 XT GeForce RTX 4080/SUPER |
Full HD 360Hz | 1440p 240Hz Ultrawide 1440p 144Hz |
4K 120-144Hz |
Of course, we have only used some examples of graphs, so if you have a different model you should look at its equivalence. For top-of-the-range graphics cards like the Radeon RX 7900
Monitor recommendation, which one to buy?
If your graphics card is low-end, the recommendation is a simple monitor: don’t complicate things, look for something cheap but of good quality that is Full HD with 60 Hz because you can’t aspire to more. An example would be the BenQ GW2283a monitor with the three “B”s (good, pretty and cheap) that will be more than enough for you.
If you have an entry-level graphics card, you can now opt for Full HD monitors with a higher refresh rate, or even simple 1440p monitors. We would rather recommend a Full HD because the experience will be better, such as the ASUS VY249HGE, which also has FreeSync Premium.
If you have a mid-range graphics card, now you can choose to increase the resolution with certain guarantees, and you have quite interesting monitors that are relatively cheap like the Ozone DSP27, a 1440p monitor with 144 Hz and that is also compatible with both FreeSync as with G-Sync, which will guarantee you a better gaming experience whether you have AMD or NVIDIA graphics.
We move on to more serious topics, the mid-high range with which we already talked about graphics of more than 500 euros. Here you could make the jump to 4K resolution, but we would recommend a 1440p monitor with a higher refresh rate, or even an ultra-widescreen one. You have many options, and a monitor like the AOC AGON AG325QZN seems very good to us. Note that it is 31.5 inches, it is quite large, and it has 240 Hz with FreeSync.
Finally, we reach the high range, with graphics that are already around or over €1,000, and that is no small feat. Here you can make the jump to 4K resolution with guarantees, but personally we prefer ultra widescreen for this level of gaming. Of course, we would recommend the Corsair Xeneon 34WQHD240-C, an OLED monitor with 3440 x 1440 resolution and 240 Hz with FreeSync and G-Sync, a real marvel. It is very expensive but it is worth it.
And as we have said before, if you have a top-of-the-range graphics card, then literally buy the monitor you want because it should be fine for you. There’s not much to add here.
