News

Nothing to fear from China: its processors continue to lag behind Intel and AMD

For a long time, both Intel and AMD have held the leadership in processors created for domestic and even industrial computer systems, something that is not a problem for those countries that do not have restrictions on the sale of products from these brands. But in regions like China this is something quite bad, since the two North American companies that lead the computer sector cannot market their products in the Asian country as they would like, one of the main reasons why many companies in the area are trying to create their own processors chinese that do not have any type of external restriction.

The advances that have been made in recent years in the field of computing are extremely great, it is one of the most advanced sectors and that due to its evolution has managed to change the world in a very short time, so the fact that a country does not have an advanced level of computing, it leaves it far behind in certain aspects. This is what has prompted China to offer a series of additional resources to companies that focus on manufacturing PC hardware, to try to match its eternal rival, the United States, in technology, but for now, its chips are far behind Intel and AMD.

Zhaoxin’s new processor fails to match those from Intel or AMD from more than 3 years ago

During the last months we have seen how from China They are making really big efforts to try to make their own processors in this way, not having to depend so much on North American manufacturers such as AMD, Intel and even Qualcomm. But the advances do not seem to be going too well, since apparently the only company that is making really considerable advances is Loongson, which although they are about four generations behind, are the ones with the most advanced processors on the Chinese market.

Another of the main companies that is within this technological race is Zhaoxinwho have presented their new processors KaiXian KX-7000based on a completely new microarchitecture, which, despite having quite considerable improvements with respect to its previous creations, are not capable of reaching the Intel and AMD models from many years ago.

Chinese processors

To see how the company’s new eight-core KaiXian KX-7000/8 performs, PCWatch has put it to the test against a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and a quad-core Intel Core i3-8100. The tests are not too good for the Chinese processor, since even facing two processors from 3 and 7 years ago respectively, it only manages to surpass the i3 in some aspects, but without a difference that is too big.

Benchmark KiaXian KX-7000/8 Core i3-8100 Ryzen 5 5600G
CPU-Z | S.T. 335.9 422.2 615.3
CPU-Z | M.T. 2517.2 1618.4 4790.5
Cinebench R23 | S.T. 584 953 1435
Cinebench R23 | M.T. 3595 3585 10387
3DMark | Time Spy 42 469 1440
3DMark | Fire Strike 86 1150 3662
3DMark | Night Raid 936 5771 16147
3DMark | Time Spy | RX6400 3512 3504 3735
3DMark | Fire Strike | RX6400 8632 9140 10327
3DMark | Night Raid | RX6400 26506 24076 34204
Dragon Quest X | iGPU 2518 4704 12137
Dragon Quest X | RX6400 4808 7387 9505
Final Fantasy XIV | RX6400 6578 7186 8521
Power Consumption | CB R23 112W 64W 102W
Power Consumption | CB R24 38W 23W 24W

It should be noted that we are talking about a processor with a consumption of more than 100 W, something much higher than what, for example, the AMD 8000 series have as a base, and even some of the new 9000 series, while they offer a much higher performance compared to the energy consumption they have, something that demonstrates the failure that Chinese processors have in terms of efficiency and performance.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *